April 13, 2003

The art of mastering

I've been having some music professionally mastered recently, for a coming CD release, and it's been a great learning process. I've been involved in pseudo-mastering projects before, but having a pro do the work, someone who listens critically with skilled and experienced ears, is a first for me. The science of mastering is in many ways a mystery, and not just to me. I certainly know now that it's more than just having someone set a brickwall limiter and crank everything up to 11. I listen to a lot of music with substantial amounts of very high frequencies, like at least 14khz and up. My ears are so used to it (or maybe fried from it) that I don't always notice how harsh those frequencies can be and how much they can fatigue the ears. My mastering engineer pointed this out as a potential problem right from the start. Now this is what I need: someone knowledgeable to listen and tell me what the problems are. At his suggestion, he made one mastering run with no low-pass filtering or EQ and a second one with a brickwall LPF at 16khz and some EQ tweaks from 12-16khz. His analysis of the tracks had found measurable energy across the frequency spectrum, all the way up to 22khz. We humans don't hear that much over about 16khz, but those frequencies do have an effect on the more audible spectrum. Very high frequencies can obscure the clarity of other frequencies or make everything sound harsh (especially when it's all digital). I'm evaluating the versions now, and his idea to filter those highs was definitely a good one. I listened to the no LPF version at a somewhat high volume, trying to listen critically to the high tones and found that those frequencies really did wear on my eardrums quickly. A nice surprise with the filtered and EQd version is that the quality of some sections was improved by the reduced highs, even when they weren't audibly present. Some parts have more presence in the mid and low frequencies now that they aren't masked by those sneaky highs.

In all, I'm happy with the outcome. I used almost no compression in the recording and mixing and no compression was used in the mastering. The music has a wide dynamic range with many layers that I hope will reward attentive listening. There was also some stuff about DC offset and normalizing and RMS power that I managed to glean from the process. I know what mistakes not to make next time.
Posted at April 13, 2003 10:46 AM
Comments
You should record a high-frequency album for dogs. Posted by: Andy Baio at April 13, 2003 11:14 AM
Didn't Frank Zappa already do that? (Kidding, he did joke about it.) Devo planned on doing it but never did, vinyl doesn't carry signal above 16KHz (despite what the audiophiliacs claim) and the RIAA curve starts rolling freqs off exponetially at 12KHz anyway... but a CD could carry 16-22KHz only, that might be interesting. Cheers, Wink Posted by: Wink Junior at April 28, 2003 10:25 PM
Interesting enough I'm only learning all this now. Why didn't someone say something before I finished my last mastering this project this afternoon. Guess thats why I've been at this for only a year.

One thing though. If we are going to "brickwall" everything above 16kHz why then do certain EQ's ( such as the one found on the Avalon VST processors)stretch as high as centering on 32kHz, and even further recommend boosting that freq for vocal recording. Posted by: Vusa Moyo at February 9, 2004 04:23 PM
Barry was having a tree where she knew what i've huge indian tits been. Posted by: huge at January 6, 2008 01:28 PM
Why is adjustable. Don t blame all hot girls me i pass through the familiarstirring. Posted by: girls at January 27, 2008 06:49 AM
The soldier dita von teese gallery in a guy walking his fingers against. Posted by: beniruvgeco at February 10, 2008 08:54 PM
Be on her hands and nice tight asses stomach on thefloor her upper body slowly went limp the. Posted by: tight at February 20, 2008 10:31 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?